One bad turn deserves another

Same topic, different approach.
Unlike Exramp I will not even try to be polite, because people making Silent Hill 5 don’t deserve it.
First thing that seems wrong right away when I think about the whole concept behind Silent Hill 5 is the main character, who so conveniently is a war veteran, a soldier. As we all know soldiers are good with guns – big guns and military equipment. Now, if you see a seventeen-year-old with a machine gun (hello silent hill 3) it may be strange, but a guy who was trained to use this kind of tools will not look suspicious with an M-16.
They already said they want to streamline combat and make it more interesting. Combat, combat, combat. Make puzzles! Get my point?

Second thing is the fact that they claimed they want to go back to the roots – make the game more focused on the plot than the action. What can we read in the article? That the guy likes Silent Hill 3 most, and for the story from all things?! You need to be a hamburger-eating twat who barely can comprehend the news to say the blunt and even at times cliché story of Silent Hill 3 is the best in the series.

That guy's approach pisses me off even more when he boldly states that they’ll make the scariest iteration of Silent Hill series. I’m sure he’s thinks the “Saw” movies are scary and we gonna get some of that gruesome, mindless violence type of “horror”. You need to be a complete moron to appreciate this kind of… stuff (couldn’t find a better word to describe it).

Note to Konami:
YOU DON’T LET AMERICANS MAKE JAPANESE GAMES!

Note to Yamaoka:
Quality control! Bah, screw it. Stick to the music!

Note to Mr. P.J.D:
Ruin this game and I will buy ten copies of it and shove them up your ass so hard that you will bleed out Sato, and you will have an opportunity to apologize to the man.